
Jonathan Clements of the Wall Street Journal continues to write excellent articles. I recommend you become a regular reader. Yesterday (5/17/2006) he wrote a column titled, "Teen Angst: How the New Tax Law Could Hurt Your College-Savings Plan."
Back in the old days before there was dirt when rocks were all sharp and pointy, tax-free Coverdell and 529 college savings accounts didn't exist. A popular way to fund college education was to buy mutual funds inside of a custodial account under the Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act. If you set up one of these UGMA custodial accounts this column's for you.
Congress in their infinite wisdom has changed the tax law. Under the previous law the first $850 of investment gains in a UGMA account was tax free. The next was taxed at the minor child's rate. Until age 14 gains above that sum were taxed at the parent's or custodian's tax rate. So people put off realizing the gains until the child turned 14 when everything past the first $850 was taxed at the child's rate.
The new law moves the age when the child's tax rate us used for the whole calculation to 18 years old from 14 years old. If you were planning on taking gains in the account this year and your child is between 14 and 18 years old, it would be worth speaking to a good tax attorney prior to realizing the gains.
Now go out there and make some money!






If you were planning on taking gains in the account this year, and your child is between 14 and 18 years old, it would be worth speaking to your child about the desirability of his helping to pay for his own education, by working his way (at least part time) through school, and (if his high school transcript grades support that goal) by applying for scholarship assistance.
There are always options to the problem of funding a college education for your children, regardless of whether or not your college savings plan has suffered a shortfall, beyond that of feeling forced to provide the whole solution, on your own, without any help.
Posted by: Bob Hansell | May 30, 2006 6:55 PM | Permalink to Comment