« Technical Trading - Basics I | Main | Efficient Markets »

Mar 6
Technical Trading - Basics II
Last time I wrote about a simple chart and how to use it to see trends.  Today I will discuss a good indicator to confirm a trend and to measure its strength.  The indicator is the Average Directional Index (ADX) developed by J Welles Wilder.

The ADX is the average of two other indicators Mr. Wilder also developed, the Positive Directional Indicator (+DI) and the Negative Directional Indicator (-DI).  As there are many web sites that explain how to calculate these, I will not discuss the calculation here.  Most technical trading software makes these indicators available.

The way ADX is calculated, using absolute values and percentages results in answers between 0 and 100.  That is, answers are always positive and are less than 100%.  In fact, it is quite rare to ever get a reading above 60. So what does the ADX indicator tell you?  A reading above 40 tells you that there is a strong trend in place either rising or falling.  A reading below 20 tells you there is a weak or no trend present and that you may be in a period of range trading (trading in a range neither going up or down regularly). 

With ADX, crossing points are also important.  When the readings move above 20, it may indicate that a trend up or down is finally developing and that you may be moving out of the trading range or sideways market.  When the reading moves below 40, it shows a weakening trend and may indicate you are about to begin range trading.

So, you can use ADX to confirm that the chart you see really does indicate a trend and also how strong that trend is.

Mr. Wilder built a trading system around the three indicators +DI, -DI and ADX.  So they can be used for more than just confirming a trend.

4 Comments/Trackbacks




Technical Analysis Principles - Cycle Duration:
-------------------------------------
How long are the cycles? That's an important question, and it's going to be a real bear to answer without any charts as visual aids, but I'll do my best. The reason it is such an important question is that all oscillators work best when you use the proper number of bars in their calculation. The correct number of bars is associated with the dominant cycle's duration at the time in question. Some traders seem to be able to find the cycles in price data very easily. Then there are other traders, like me, who have a harder time with this. I'll describe several aids I use in finding cycles.

The first step in determining a cycle duration is to have a good understanding of the time horizon you want to use in your trading. Some traders trade VERY frequently -- often several times a week for each tradeable they are tracking. Others trade only once every several years. It is vital that you know which approach meets YOUR investment or speculative goals, and which approach fits your personality. If you are a frequent trader using daily charts, like me, then you need to be looking for cycles in markets that last from eight to thirteen days. If you are moderately active, you need to be looking for cycles that last from 32 to 52 days. If you are very inactive, you probably ought to be using weekly charts and looking for 26 week cycles and longer.

Try to use the same number of bars on all your charts and train your eyes to "see" the dominant cycle you use in your trading. Remember that there are cycles superimposed on top of cycles in the market. Short cycles are floating on longer cycles. Obviously, their duration is only a fraction of the longer cycles.

The standard deviation envelope tool can help you to "see" cycles. When prices "rub against the bottom" of that kind of envelope, you are near the start of a new cycle with a duration expected to be as long as that for which you calculated your standard deviation of the chart. If the envelope is rising, count bars between the lowest prices attained when prices are "rubbing against the bottom" of the envelope. Cycles are not always easy to see. Standard deviation envelopes can help you identify the cycles when the data is more confusing than not.
Use an envelope calculation duration that is about the length of the cycle you want to trade and look for extreme prices near the edges of the envelopes. Those prices will be the peaks and valleys of the cycle in which you are interested.

The trend channel function is another handy tool to help you find cycles. The first step in using a trend channel, when looking for cycles, is to draw one between two obvious turning points on a chart. Then look at points where the prices touch or get close to the bottom of a rising trend channel or the top of a falling channel. Those are starting points of cycles. Don't use a point like this unless prices have touched the opposite edge of the trend channel since the last similar point was made. Count the number of bars between these points to obtain cycle durations. Do not count a touch point which has not touched the top edge of a channel since its last touch of the bottom edge.

Oscillators can also help you find peaks and valleys in price curves that correspond with the starts of cycles. Use oscillators that are calculated with durations close to the cycle durations which you want to trade. In an upward trend, the valleys in oscillators often correspond with the starts of cycles. In a downward trend, the peaks of oscillators often correspond with the starts of cycles. Use the lowest (or highest) prices obtained near an oscillator bottom (or top) as the exact starts of cycles. Once you train your eyes to "see" the cycles in which you are interested, you can usually pick them up by just looking at a chart and counting bars between valleys in a rising trend and peaks in a falling trend.

Remember that cycles are not always present in prices. To obtain the best estimate of the cycle durations that ARE present, go to the last point on the price chart where the cycles were fairly regular and use cycle duration obtained from THAT period for your PRESENT oscillator calculations.

Hey, is there anybody else out there who can help Larry out with a comment or a question? Or how about taking ME on?

Surely, SOMEBODY out there is reading this stuff and wondering what on earth my comments to Larry's posted subject matter have to do with the price of eggs. If you all really understand this stuff so perfectly, will one of you please explain some of it back to me again, and help me learn how to trade more profitably?

Come on folks, this is supposed to be an I-N-T-E-R-A-C-T-I-V-E blog. It's not like Larry is asking us to pose in the nude!

Maybe it would help some if I backed off for a while and took a little "comment break" for a while. (Or maybe I'm just running out of gas!)

OK, Bob/Larry, here we go.

Most academics I know say that technical analysis flat out doesn't work. Of course, these same academics suggest that fundamental analysis and even inside information don't lead to above market returns once properly adjusted for risk.

Just for the sake of discussion, my friends, how do you respond to such academics?

ddt

Oh, horsefeathers! I have observed that the academics have a tendency to say a LOT of stuff that just isn't proven to be very reliable (i.e. the TRUTH) when examined in the cold light of reality. Think back onto your own undergraduate coursework for a prime example which bolsters my point.

Those who say that technical analysis simply doesn't ever work should really sit down and talk with (infamous) Chicago local Dennis Richie, who has made countless millions of dollars over several decades trading commodities, based solely upon the technical analysis buy and sell signals plotted out in his chartbooks. (Dennis has since retired from active trading, on his trading profits). Or those same academics might want to talk to the former employees of C.R.T. (Chicago Trading & Research), one of the greatest technical analysis shops to have ever existed for years (before they were bought out by a division of Goldman, Sachs, I believe). For that matter, they should probably talk to Goldman, Sachs arbitrage trading desk, or to Merrill Lynch's or Smith Barney's or Lehman Brothers'. Convince them that they are wasting millions of dollars programming proprietary software to enable their traders to mechanically execute orders based solely upon technical analysis principles. For that matter, I would suggest that these same academics have a little chat with Larry Stay's boss about the value of this exercise which they so ignorantly scorn.

Properly adjusted for risk, I can make a case for you that neither technical nor fundamental analysis will necessarily "lead to above-market returns." Historic performance is no guarantee of future return, and trading losses, generated from all sorts of sources, are a simple fact of life for any trader. Most traders suffer more losses than they do winners, but most good traders minimize their losses and maximize their winners.

Technicians are certainly not "at war" with the principles of fundamental analysis. In fact, I would PREFER to have ENOUGH emperical economic data and information to make ALL of my trading decisions based just upon the fundamentals. That would be so very nice! Unfortunately, I can't. The world is not so simple. It is not just a question of black or white. It is instead a question of which covering shades of gray! It is in the ABSENCE of CLEAR FUNDAMENTALS that technical analysis can provide particularly valuable (and potentially profitable) trading insight. Besides, so many other traders are engaged in its practice now that it is critical to my own trading success that I have at least an elemental understanding of certain technical analysis principles, because if a large enough universe of my fellow traders is following those same breadcrumbs along the trail, then generally their communal expectations become self-fulfilling prophesies.

I would suggest that perhaps the academics should come out from behind their curtains and view the real world and the way it really works in practice. They might be rather surprised to discover their theoretical constructs are more abstract than they are pragmatic in practical application, and not everything in life operates just the way their academic models predict it should all the time. (I wonder WHY that is?)

submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Technical Trading - Basics I | Main | Efficient Markets »

Advertise

Related Resources

recent comments

    sponsored ads



    subscribe


    Prefer Email?
    Subscribe below-

    Enter your Email:


    Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

    Current News

    Support This Blog

    blogroll


    business social media

    Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

    BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
    BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
    BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
    BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
    BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
    BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

    Know More Media - Finance / Banking / Insurance

    know more media network

    View Network Map

    Network Feed List (OPML)

    Know More Media Network
    Feed


    we support unitus

    PRWeb

    Influencer



    GrowYourFunds is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

    Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

    ProductivityGoal

    CallCenterScript

    AdHurl

    TheBizofKnowledge

    LandingTheDeal

    CustomersAreAlways

    HealthCareVox

    BrainBasedBusiness

    TheInsurancePolicy

    MarketingBlurb